Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Karen's avatar

There are no"isms" in legitimate scientific research. Darwinism is a term used by those with a 19th century perspective. Darwin's observations, updated with findings from biochemistry and other strands of study, have proven themselves valid. I find the use of the term is often used by people who believe in Intelligent Design or its cousin, creationism. (I was going to call it idiot cousin.). I prefer to use the term evolutionary biology; it combines genetics, chemistry, zoology, paleontology, stratiography and natural history. It's legit science. Darwinism is an insult.

Expand full comment
Random thinker's avatar

Thank you for an informative article, I knew of Dobzhansky but wasn't familiar with his work. What is your view on the current situation in abiogenesis? Evolution, whatever version one takes, is about change. For something to change (evolve), something needs to exist which is able to do so. That something has to be in some way "organic", or perhaps "pre-organic", in order to be subject to evolutionary change?

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts