Ponder this. As you read the essay, is not everything in the essay something one can be aware OF.
What is it in which all that is described in the essay exists (That, as Paul said - quoting a 3rd century BC poet - in which “we live and move and have our being”)
What is it, as the Upanishads and the Gita say, knowing which, all is known? The ‘Knower of the Field” (the field of perception, the field of panexperientialism) in all Fields?
Kinda lost me in the weeds but I do think that feelings do exist outside of the subjective self. How else explain the phenomenon of empathy? How else explain psychic experiences that arise from feelings imprinted in certain locatons from past traumata?
Beautifully written….. and yet…
Ponder this. As you read the essay, is not everything in the essay something one can be aware OF.
What is it in which all that is described in the essay exists (That, as Paul said - quoting a 3rd century BC poet - in which “we live and move and have our being”)
What is it, as the Upanishads and the Gita say, knowing which, all is known? The ‘Knower of the Field” (the field of perception, the field of panexperientialism) in all Fields?
Kinda lost me in the weeds but I do think that feelings do exist outside of the subjective self. How else explain the phenomenon of empathy? How else explain psychic experiences that arise from feelings imprinted in certain locatons from past traumata?