Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Don Salmon's avatar

the only way we can know God is to know Her directly.

On the other hand, "Science is adept at detecting and measuring that which is not directly detectable" - when you say "science" is adept" it's not clear what you refer to.

Science only has one ultimate tool for directly detecting anything - human perception. Technology doesn't "detect" - it responds blindly with read-outs, which human minds analyze.

That's it - human perception (of the most ordinary, superficial kind, as scientific education does not include a single class in refining perception) and analysis (also of the ordinary kind, that all scientific training refines it). The fact that the greatest scientists regularly make philosophic pronouncements that would be given a failing grade in an advanced placement high school philosophy class indicates that the training of the mind found in scientific education is extremely limited.

Going beyond that, philosophic education in the modern age mostly offers a different kind of thinking but hardly more than a refined version of ordinary human analysis.

If we are going to go "beyond belief" it might be wise to take a look at the forms of intuition refined in contemplative traditions around the world, which even with a limited glance would show the ease with which one can know and see God, and the impossibility of even defining the pure "matter" or "physical stuff" which so many philosophically illiterate scientists take to be "Reality."

Expand full comment
Ms. Billie M. Spaight's avatar

Spot on! I was thinking along similar lines--how could things just HAPPEN unless they were guided somehow? I like that you point out the consistency of phenomena as well. BTW, G-d is nonbinary.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts